Legal Opinion

Mathey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided October 19, 1949No. 4407PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODBURY, Circuit Judge.

The basic question presented by this petition for review of a decision of the Tax Court of the United States is whether the entire net amount awarded to the taxpayer in a suit for patent infringement constituted^ taxable income to him in the year of realization, as the Commissioner contends, or a non-taxable return of capital, as the taxpayer contends.

Following the decision of United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co., 297 U.S. 88, 56 S.Ct. 353, 80 L.Ed. 500, the general rule adopted by -several Courts of Appeals, including this one, apparently without a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Raytheon Production Corp. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
  4. Durkee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  5. Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Safety Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Felix Benitez RexachCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  2. Livesay Window Company, Inc. v. Livesay Industries, Inc., and Everett G. Livesay Window Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Sanders v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  4. Sanders v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. Freeman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API