Mathey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOODBURY, Circuit Judge.
The basic question presented by this petition for review of a decision of the Tax Court of the United States is whether the entire net amount awarded to the taxpayer in a suit for patent infringement constituted^ taxable income to him in the year of realization, as the Commissioner contends, or a non-taxable return of capital, as the taxpayer contends.
Following the decision of United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co., 297 U.S. 88, 56 S.Ct. 353, 80 L.Ed. 500, the general rule adopted by -several Courts of Appeals, including this one, apparently without a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Raytheon Production Corp. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1944
- Durkee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Safety Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Felix Benitez RexachCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
- Livesay Window Company, Inc. v. Livesay Industries, Inc., and Everett G. Livesay Window Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Sanders v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- Sanders v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Freeman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.