Legal Opinion
Mathey v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 13, 1944No. 4448PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
This case was sent to a special master to take and state the amount of damages, which the plaintiff sustained and of the gains and profits which the defendant made by reason of the defendant’s infringement of claims 2, 4, and 16 of plaintiff’s patent No. 1,807,996, issued June 2, 1931, for a. heel flap trimming machine. The history of the patent, the claims involved, and those found to be infringed, will be found in 32 F.Supp. 684, affirmed 1 Cir., 117 F.2d 331.
The master took as the commencement date of the accounting period, July 29, 1931,. the date formal notice of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Minnesota Moline Plow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Mowry v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Birdsall v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Duplate Corp. v. Triplex Safety Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bandag, Inc. v. Gerrard Tire Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Mathey v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Saf-Gard Products, Inc. v. Service Parts, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1980
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Zenith Radio Corporation and the Rauland CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.