Legal Opinion
MPT, Inc. v. Marathon Labels, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 19, 2007No. 1:04-cv-02357PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum, Opinion and Order
GAUGHAN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
A number of post-trial motions have been filed by the parties. Plaintiff MPT, Inc. (“MPT”) has filed a Motion for Entry of Judgment Including Permanent Injunction (Doc. 272) and a Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 271). Defendants Marathon Labels, Inc. (“Marathon”) and Polymeric Converting LLC (“Polymeric”) have filed Renewed Motions for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Doc. 270, 273). MPT has filed a Motion to Strike Defendants’ Motions (Doc. 277). These motions follow a jury verdict in favor of MPT on its claims that Defendants…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- 800 Adept, Inc. v. Murex Securities, Ltd.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2007
- Custom Designs of Nashville, Inc. v. Alsa Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010