Legal Opinion

Lincoln Bus Co. v. Jersey Mutual, C., Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 5, 1933PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant company insured taxicab and jitney bus owners against liability. For the history of how this insolvent mutual insurance company landed here, see 112 N.J. Eq. 523.

The receiver now petitions for leave to assess the two thousand four hundred policy holders upon their contingent liability under their policies and the statute, to put him in funds to pay losses. Upon the return of the order to show cause a few appeared and objected to his method. Ordinarily the matter would be referred to a master, but they asked the court to hear their objections.

Section 6 of the Insurance act of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Wardle v. TownsendMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Davis v. Parcher & J. & A. Stewart Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. McDermott v. WoodhouseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1917
  5. Easton National Bank v. American Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. People ex rel. Palmer v. Central Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. Keystone Indemnity ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Miller v. Barnwell Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  5. J. P. Cullen & Sons, Inc. v. MortensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API