Mitchell v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiff, acting as the liquidator of California Highway Indemnity Exchange, brought this action against the defendant subscribers of said exchange, seeking a declaratory judgment declaring among other things the method to be employed in determining the liability of the subscribers. From the judgment entered by the trial court, defendants appeal.
The California Highway Indemnity Exchange was a reciprocal or interinsurance exchange organized under the act of 1921 known as the Reciprocal or Interinsurance Act. (Stats. 1921, p. 1599.) Said act will be hereinafter referred to as the “reciprocal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sergeant v. Goldsmith Dry Goods Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1920
- Stone v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Langworthy v. GardingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- W. R. Roach & Co. v. HardingIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Lincoln Bus Co. v. Jersey Mutual, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. BelousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- True v. RoblesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Weaver v. Pasadena Tournament of Roses Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Richardson v. Kelly, Recr.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
- Texas Commerce Bank v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.