Legal Opinion

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. Keystone Indemnity Exchange

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1940No. Appeal, 43PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me, Justice Linn,

When this case was here before, 335 Pa. 333, 6 A. (2d) 821, we considered two questions — all that were stated by appellant — -and held that subscribers were liable to assessment in an amount “not less than one additional annual premium or deposit charged”, even though the policies provided they should be non-assessable. This conclusion was required by the legislation 1 regulating reciprocal and inter-insurance exchanges; the parties could not, by their own agreement, set aside the statute. We adhere to what was then decided. After the opinion was filed, other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Commonwealth v. Keystone Indemnity ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Lincoln Bus Co. v. Jersey Mutual, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  4. Susquehanna Mutual Fire Insurance v. Gackenbach & SeisloveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
  5. Taggart, Ins. Com. v. GrahamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Taggart v. Wachter, Hoskins & Russel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  2. People ex rel. Palmer v. Central Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  3. Neel, Insurance Commissioner v. WilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Kelly v. Commonwealth Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Neel v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API