Legal Opinion

Ohio & Mississippi Railroad v. Hammersley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1867PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL from the Martin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.

— This was an action by the appellee to recover for the death of his son, a minor, caused by the negligence of the appellant.

Among other defenses, the appellant answered that the deceased was in the employ of the railroad company, and that his duties were to furnish water to the other servants employed on a construction train, and that in violation of the known rule of said appellant, he took a position upon the engine drawing. said train, and that by reason of the position so occupied the injury resulted, and without the fault of the appellant.

On the trial, the appellant offered a witness to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
  2. Wright v. . New York Central Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  3. Slattery's Administrator v. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Chamberlain v. Mil. & Miss. R. R.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Berry v. CarleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1825

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. City of Galveston v. BarbourTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Indianapolis & Greenfield Rapid Transit Co. v. ForemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern R. W. Co. v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API