Barbaroux v. Barker
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 12 — PETITION ORDINARY cited Civil Code, sec. 133 ; 16 B. Mon., 201 ; 6 J. J. Mar., 129; 2 B. Mon., 29» ; 16 B. Mon., 201. cited 13 B. Mon..,- 391 ; 16 lb., 575 ; 14 lb., 352; 10 lb., 268 ; Story on Prom. Notes, sees. 194, 195.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE BULLITT
delivered the opinion op the court:
Barker sued Barbaroux upon his note for $200, dati d January 6, 1«60, payable ninety-five days thereafter, to the order of E. Ho brook, and assigned by him to Durkee, Heath & Co., and by them to Barker.
Barbaroux answered, pleading as a set-off Holbrook’s note to him for $504, dated January 6, 1860, and payable four months after date.
Barker filed a reply, stating that on the 6th January, I860, *48cilid. BSoT 1)cirOua "xTiC o C/TiU OUClLV^U. «.«.Ok it appeared that Holbrook’s account against Barbaroux amounted to $2,519.43, and Barbaroux’s account…
2Cited by111 opinions
- Randall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Flike v. . Boston and Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.