Legal Opinion

Clark v. Erdman Meat Packing

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 21, 1987No. WCB 84-06392; CA A39563PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board reversing the referee’s opinion and order and denying benefits for claimant’s back condition. The fundamental question is whether claimant’s employment activities at Erdman Meat Packing Company was the major contributing cause of his back condition. We find that it was not and affirm.

Claimant sustained a nondisabling compensable lumbar strain while employed at Hatcher Construction Company in 1979. The injury produced sharp lower back pain approximately twice a month over a period of several years, but claimant never missed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Boise Cascade Corp. v. StarbuckOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. O'NEAL v. Sisters of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Matter of Compensation of StarbuckCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Blakely v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Jewell v. SAIF Corp. (In re Jewell)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API