Legal Opinion

Canavan's Case

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 1, 1999No. 98-P-1253PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPorada, J.

The principal issue in this case is the admission in evidence of the opinions of the employee’s medical expert on diagnosis, disability, and causation. The self-insurer, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, claims that this evidence, under the test set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and adopted by our Supreme Judicial Court in Commonwealth v. Lanigan, 419 Mass. 15, 26 (1994), should not have been admitted by an administrative judge (judge) in a workers’ compensation hearing to determine the self-insurer’s request to discontinue compensation and the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. LaniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Summers v. Missouri Pacific Railroad SystemCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. Barbara Kornock v. Patricia Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Vassallo v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Canavan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Patterson v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API