Bruns v. Paccar, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
John Bruns and 23 other truck drivers (Drivers) appeal the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of PACCAR in a design defect products liability case. Appellants assert the trial court erroneously granted summary judgment because they presented genuine issues of material fact as to the existence of a design defect and as to causation. We reverse.
Dallas-Mavis & Company employs truck drivers to transport trucks manufactured by Kenworth Trucking, a division of PACCAR, Inc., to purchasers throughout North America. Kenworth inspects and test drives completed trucks for less than…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
- Richard Leander Ferebee, Jr. v. Chevron Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- State v. CauthronWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Ham & Rye, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Cox v. the Keg Restaurants US, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Ham & Rye, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Pagnotta v. Beall Trailers of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.