Legal Opinion

Peerless Food Products Co. v. Barrows

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1957No. 33967PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an action to recover damages allegedly arising out of a collision of motor vehicles which occurred about four p. m. October 29, 1954, at the intersection of highway 410 and Glenn road; near the city of Montesano, Washington.

Plaintiff’s vehicle, a 1953 two-ton truck, tractor, and refrigerator van was proceeding in an easterly direction on highway 410. Simultaneously, the vehicle driven by defendant Barrows was proceeding in a southerly direction on Glenn road toward highway 410.

The defendant testified that he stopped upon approaching the intersection, looked to his right and then to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Massengale v. SvangrenWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Sigurdson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Nopson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Gibson v. Spokane United RailwaysWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Pyle v. WilbertWashington Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dunnill v. BloombergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  2. B. J. Rhay, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary v. James E. BrowderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. Roumel v. FudeWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. BrowderWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Barnes v. LABOR HALL ASS'N., INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API