Legal Opinion

State v. Browder

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1963No. 36252PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James Earl Browder appeals from a judgment of conviction on multiple counts of forgery.

Appellant freely admitted at the trial, and in written briefs here, that he signed the name of Byron D. Hunt to checks on Hunt’s bank account, but insisted that Hunt had authorized him so to do. This Hunt emphatically denied. Hunt testified, however, that he had lost both his wallet and checkbook.

The court instructed:

“You are instructed that the adoption of another name or an assumed name is permissible if the purpose involved is an honest one. The burden is upon the defendant to show that he adopted the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Miller v. StatonWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. LyskoskiWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State v. ClaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hamilton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. LouieWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API