Stinespring v. Natorp Garden Stores, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Doan, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Sarah Stinespring was injured while playing on a jungle gym located on property owned by defendant-appellee, Natorp Garden Stores, Inc. She and her parents, plaintiffs-appellants Wayne Stinespring and Christina Stinespring, filed suit against Natorp, alleging that the jungle gym was unreason ably dangerous and that Sarah’s injuries were the result of Natorp’s negligence. Subsequently, Natorp filed a motion for summary judgment.
The evidentiary materials supporting and opposing summary judgment showed that on May 2,1996, Sarah, who was then five years old, went…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
- Di Gildo v. CaponiOhio Supreme Court · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Greene v. WhitesideOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Dolan v. St. Mary's Memorial HomeOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Evans v. ThrasherOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Caruso v. National City Mortgage Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Columbia Dev. Corp. v. KrohnOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.