Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Caruso v. National City Mortgage Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 30, 2010No. C-090433PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dinkelacker, Judge.

I. Facts and Procedure

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, William A. Caruso, filed suit against defendantsappellees, National City Mortgage Company, Elizabeth Louis Hopf, and Empire Real Estate Solutions, relating to a failed real estate investment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of appellees on all of Caruso’s claims. He has filed a timely appeal from that judgment.

*331{¶ 2} The record shows that Caruso was a licensed real estate agent and a savvy real estate investor. His investment strategy, acquired from years of working in the real estate business, involved…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Haddon View Investment Co. v. CoopersOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Floor Craft Floor Covering, Inc. v. Parma Community General Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Corporex Development & Construction Management, Inc. v. Shook, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Grant Thornton v. Windsor House, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eysoldt v. ProScan ImagingOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Alexander v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Skaff v. KhutorskyOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Bierl v. BGZ Assoc. II, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Burlington Insurance v. Artisan Mechanical, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API