Legal Opinion
Munter v. Lankford
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 3, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 732-53PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
H'OLTZOFF, District Judge.
The principal’ question presented in this case is whether a waiver of the statute of limitations contained in a promissory note,. or other written instrument, is enforceable, or is void as contrary to public policy. The case comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment.
The complaint consists of two counts. The first count sets forth a claim against the defendants as joint makers of a promissory note for $5,000. The note is dated June 28,. 1935, and was due two: years after date, i., e., June 28, 1937. This action was brought on February 17, 1953, —…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Adams v. StenehjemMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Crane v. FrenchMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
- Forbach v. SteinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martin v. George Hyman Construction Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- In Re US Office Products Co. Securities Lit.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- In Re US Office Products Co. Securities Litigat.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Toomey v. CammackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hirtler v. HirtlerUtah Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.