Legal Opinion

Forbach v. Steinfeld

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1928No. Civil No. 2755PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

On March 6th, and May 21st, respectively, in the year 1915, Forbach & Company, a copartnership, of which William Forbach, hereinafter called defendant, was a member, executed certain promissory notes in favor of the Consolidated National Bank of Tucson. The first was due sixty days after date, and the second on demand. Each of these notes contained the following clause:

“The makers and endorsers of this note waive grace, presentment, demand, notice of dishonor, protest and statute of limitations.”

On October 4, 1915, the bank brought suit in the Superior Court of Pinal county against defendant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Shapley v. . AbbottNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Crane v. FrenchMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Wells, Fargo & Co. v. EnrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State Loan & Trust Co. v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Waugh v. LennardArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ross v. RossArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Arizona State Land Department v. McFateArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Steinfeld v. MartenyArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. CSA 13-101 Loop, LLC v. Loop 101, LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API