Hirtler v. Hirtler
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Before us is the validity of the lower court’s action in granting a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff sued on a promissory note executed by defendant September 14, 1966. The action was filed August 10, 1976.
The note was payable on demand. Plaintiff alleged no payment although demand had been made. Defendant pleaded the statute of limitations, Sec. 78-12-23(2), U.C.A.1953, which provides a six year limitation on an action upon a contract such as the one under consideration. Contained in the note was the following provision:. The right to plead any and all statutes of limitations as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Ross v. RossArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Sand Lake Lounge, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Squyres v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- National Bond & Investment Co. v. FlaigerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kobbeman v. OlesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Haggerty v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- United States v. Warren Brown & Sons FarmsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1994
- Ahmad v. Eastpines Terrace Apartments, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- First National Bank of Eastern Arkansas v. Arkansas Development Finance AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.