Legal Opinion

United States v. Private E1 DEMETRIUS R. CRUDRUP

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 18, 2008No. ARMY 20050112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ZOLPER, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of resisting apprehension and making a false official statement, in violation of Articles 95 and 107, 10 U.S.C. §§ 895 and 907 [hereinafter UCMJ]. Contrary to his pleas, the military judge also found appellant guilty of signing a false official record and assault consummated by battery (three specifications), in violation of Articles 107 and 128, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907 and 928. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to three years confinement and a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. RankinCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. EppsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. United States v. FeltyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. CrudupCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  2. United States v. CrudupCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. CrudupCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API