Legal Opinion
United States v. Rankin
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided January 31, 2007No. 06-0119/NAPublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge BAKER
delivered the opinion of the Court.
On February 14, 2001, a special court-martial composed of officer members convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of unauthorized absence, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 886 (2000). The adjudged and approved sentence included a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for ninety-one days. The United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. United States v. Rankin, 63 M.J. 552, 557 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App.2006). We granted review to determine whether certain documents admitted at trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Esteban Bahena-CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. RankinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- State v. FranklinTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. HarcrowCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. GardinierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. TearmanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. ThomasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.