Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Crudup

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided December 4, 2008No. 08-0392/ARPublished

1Dissent

EFFRON, Chief Judge, with whom BAKER, Judge,

joins (dissenting):

Appellant was convicted of a variety of offenses arising out of an incident involving his wife and his infant son. The offenses included assaulting his wife, assaulting his son, resisting apprehension, making a false official statement, and signing a false official record.

At trial, a military law enforcement officer who responded to the scene of an altercation between Appellant and his wife on August 28, 2004, testified about the information he had obtained from Appellant’s wife. According to the officer, Appellant’s wife said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. OthuruCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  5. United States v. Private E1 DEMETRIUS R. CRUDRUPArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API