United States v. Crudup
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
*93Judge STUCKY
delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted review to decide whether the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) erred in holding that the improper admission of an out-of-court, testimonial statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.
I. Background
A. Facts
The CCA described the facts of the case as follows:
On 28 August 2004, Military Police (MP) Officer Sergeant (SGT) Vasquez was called to investigate allegations by one of appellant’s neighbors, Mrs. F, of a domestic disturbance near appellant’s government quarters on Fort Carson, Colorado. Mrs. F…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Yates v. EvattSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. OthuruCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. GardinierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. TearmanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012
- United States v. Specialist LEVI A. KEEFAUVERArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2015