Legal Opinion

United States v. Super. Ct. in & for Maricopa Cty.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1985No. 17623-SA, 17681-SAPublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

The United States, the San Carlos Apache tribe, and the Tonto Apache tribe (petitioners) bring these consolidated special action petitions challenging the jurisdiction of the courts of this state to adjudicate petitioners’ claims to water rights in certain rivers. They attack, as well, the procedures adopted by the Arizona legislature for adjudication of such claims.

The petitions arise out of proceedings pending before the superior court of Maricopa County entitled: “In re the General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Gila River System and Source, Maricopa County…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. CSR LTD. v. LinkTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API