People v. Marblehead Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
— The plaintiff and respondent instituted this proceeding in eminent domain for the purpose of acquiring certain lands in the county of Ventura, alleged in its complaint as being necessary to the completion of a system of state highways contemplated by legislative acts of 1909 and 1915, and by section 2, article XVI, of the constitution of the state of California, adopted July 1, 1919.
The constitutional provision last mentioned directed the preparation of forty thousand suitable state bonds in the denomination of one thousand dollars each, bearing interest at the rate of four and one-half per…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- City of Menlo Park v. ArtinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Linggi v. GarovottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.