Legal Opinion

People v. Marino

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1935No. Crim. No. 1817PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Appellant was charged with the commission of three crimes: pandering, pimping and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. These charges were consolidated and the evidence as to all three was presented to one jury. Appellant was acquitted of the offense of pimping, but was found guilty of the other two offenses. Motion for new trial was made and denied. This is an appeal from the order and from the final judgment of conviction.

The main point relied upon for a reversal is that the evidence is insufficient to show appellant was guilty of pandering, but at most shows appellant to have been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  2. People v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. People v. CascinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. People v. SchmahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API