Legal Opinion

People v. Cascino

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1934No. Docket No. 1761PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, Acting P. J.

The appellants Cascino, Tartaro and Cirimele were found guilty by a jury of the crime of second degree 'burglary, and they have appealed from the judgment of conviction, urging as grounds for reversal insufficiency of evidence and error in the giving and the refusal to give certain instructions.

The place alleged to have been burglarized was a grocery store on the corner of Fillmore and Jackson Streets, San Francisco. Shortly after midnight, Officers McLaughlin and Schuler, while patroling their district in a radio-equipped police car, received instructions over the radio to proceed to said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. EmmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. People v. MatezuskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SanchezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. People v. MarinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. State v. GrubaughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State v. GrubaughNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API