Legal Opinion

People v. Schmah

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1923No. Crim. No. 1107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Sure, J.

Defendant drove his automobile over Carl Grove, eight years of age, fracturing the boy’s skull, as a result of which he died. The jury found a verdict of guilty of manslaughter as charged, and defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

Counsel for defendant, in their opening brief, state the points as follows:

“There are two questions involved on this appeal. The first arises in connection with the meaning of an instruction to the jury concerning the intent of the defendant. In this regard the court gave section 22 of the Penal Code which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BesoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. People v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. People v. BruggyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. People v. MarinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People v. DailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API