Legal Opinion

State v. Honeycutt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1953No. 218PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoimsoK, J.

First, the defendant urges that the evidence was insufficient to carry the case to the jury over his motion for judgment as of nonsuit made at the conclusion of all the evidence. This brings into focus the evidence relied on by the State.

"Will J. Harmon testified: “I hold the position of Deputy Sheriff with Avery County. I was Deputy Sheriff on the 25th day of June, 1952. I know Bob Honeycutt. ... On that day Mr. E. M. Harmon gave me a warrant for him for a worthless check. I went up the road and . . . met him and his son in a car. ... I went a little piece and turned around— came back down…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. State v. GastonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. State v. RaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  5. In Re the Will of KempSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. McGowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. State v. MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API