Legal Opinion

State v. Rainey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1953No. 649PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant places chief stress on a group, of exceptions which challenge the competency of vital evidence offered by the State on the ground that it was obtained under an illegal search warrant. The search warrant was issued under substantially these circumstances: A peace officer appeared before the Deputy Clerk of the Greensboro-Municipal County Court and informed her, without being sworn, that he had reason to believe the defendant, who lived at 404 East Street in the City of Greensboro, had intoxicating, liquor in her possession for the purpose of sale. The Deputy Clerk then prepared…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . StancillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Wilson v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. PaigeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. InglandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API