Legal Opinion

State v. Meadows

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1982No. 89A81PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

In this appeal defendant’s dispositive assignments of error relate to the admissibility of polygraph examination results and jury instructions pertaining to this evidence. We find merit in these assignments and order a new trial. We find no merit in defendant’s contention that the burglary charge should have been dismissed or that the jury instructions on this offense were erroneous. Other errors assigned are not likely to arise at a new trial; therefore they do not merit discussion.

The state’s evidence tends to show:

Valerie Moore, the alleged victim, lived with her husband,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. ReaganMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. MilanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. FoyeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GrierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. WaffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. UpchurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API