In Re the Will of Kemp
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
The caveators assert that tbe trial judge erred to their prejudice in excluding and receiving evidence, and in charging tke jury.
Tbe assignments of error based on rulings upon evidential matters are reviewed in tbe numbered paragraphs set forth below.
1. E. J. Burkle, a witness for tbe caveators, testified, in part, that be was a friend of Annis S. Kemp; that be met her unexpectedly in tbe business section of Askeboro some three months subsequent to tbe date of tke script; that be forthwith greeted her by name; that she did not recognize him when he first addressed her; but that she recalled…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Clary's Administrators v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
- Michael v. . FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Bost v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
- Hughes v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Horah v. . KnoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. WadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- In Re the Investigation of the Death of MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
- Wheeler v. DentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.