Legal Opinion
City of Seattle v. Proctor
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 24, 1935No. 24711. Department OnePublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.
The appellant was found guilty in the police court of the city of Seattle of a violation of •§ 5 of ordinance No. 43475 of that city. He appealed to the superior court, where, after trial to the court, he was again found guilty and a fine imposed in accordance with the penalties prescribed in § 7 of the ordinance.
The errors assigned by appellant question the correctness of rulings made by the court excluding certain evidence offered by him, and challenge the validity of § 5 of the ordinance upon constitutional and other grounds.
The complaint upon which appellant was prosecuted charged:
“That…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Patton v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Detamore v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Tolliver v. BlizzardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Lawton v. Stewart Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Lauterbach v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 2021
- J.S.K. Enterprises, Inc. v. City of LaceyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Ragan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.