Legal Opinion

J.S.K. Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Lacey

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 17, 1971No. 361-2PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the City of Lacey to declare invalid an ordinance which amends & prior ordinance regulating the operation of massage parlors, to restrain the city from enforcing the ordinance, and to seek damages for interfering with the operation of plaintiff’s business. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case the defendant city moved to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This motion was primarily grounded upon the validity of ordinance No. 139 as a reasonable exercise of the police power of the city.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Bowe v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Darrin v. GouldWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Singer v. HaraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Kisley v. City of Falls ChurchSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  4. Gora v. City of FerndaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. City & County of Denver v. NielsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API