Legal Opinion
Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 5, 2015No. 14-3953, 14-3990, 15-3032PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant Exel, Inc. (“Exel”), a shipping broker, sued Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. (“SRT”), an interstate motor carrier, after SRT lost a shipment of pharmaceutical products it had agreed to transport for Exel on behalf of Exel’s client, Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz”). The district court awarded Exel the replacement value of the lost goods pursuant to the transportation contract between Exel and SRT, rejecting SRT’s argument that its liability was limited under the Car-mack…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Perlin v. Time Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- DaSilva v. Border Transfer of MA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Val's Auto Sales & Repair, LLC v. GarciaDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Exel, Inc. v. S. Refrigerated Transp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.