Legal Opinion

Exel, Inc. v. Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided May 8, 2017No. Case No. 2:10-CV-994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge

A .truck, filled with millions of dollars’ worth of pharmaceuticals was stolen. The trucking company — Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. (“SRT”) — is at fault. The shipper — Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz") — claims that the pharmaceuticals were worth $8.6 million. A federal statute — the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 14706 et seq.— imposes strict liability on motor carriers for “actual loss or injury to.property,” but a narrow exception applies if the shipper agrees to a limitation of liability. SRT argues that Sandoz drafted shipping…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Hartsel v. KeysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. William Tennial v. United Parcel Serv.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. M-20304 v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2022
  2. Michaela Bohemia, LLC v. FedEx CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  3. Triax, Inc. v. Tforce Freight Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API