Legal Opinion

Exel, Inc. v. S. Refrigerated Transp., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 25, 2018No. 17-3904/3917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

*458 This case arises under the Carmack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 14706 et seq. Exel, Inc., a shipping broker, sued Southern Refrigerated Transport, Inc. (SRT), an interstate motor carrier, after SRT lost a load of pharmaceuticals owned by Exel's customer, Sandoz, Inc., that was being transported from Pennsylvania to Tennessee. After nearly seven years of litigation, including a prior appeal, the district court entered judgment for Exel and awarded it the replacement cost of the lost pharmaceuticals, which amounted to approximately $5.9…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Build 4 Impact, Inc. v. Panther II Transportation, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
  2. EMCO Corporation v. Miller Transfer & Rigging Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
  3. Michaela Bohemia, LLC v. FedEx CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
  4. Triax, Inc. v. Tforce Freight Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API