Legal Opinion
Perlin v. Time Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 15, 2017No. CASE NO. 16-10635PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 10)
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Carolyn Perlin filed a two-count complaint against defendant Time Inc., alleging in Count 1 that Defendant violated Michigan’s Video Rental Privacy Act (“VRPA”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.1711 et seq., and alleging in Count 2 that Defendant was unjustly enriched through its violation of the VRPA. (See Compl, Doc. 1). Now before the .Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 10). Defendant argues that a recent amendment- to the VRPA, eliminating the VRPA’s…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Boelter v. Hearst Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- CMH Liquidating Trust v. Anderson (In re Cmty. Mem'l Hosp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Crane v. American Bar AssociationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
- Dixon v. The Washington and Jane Smith Community-BeverlyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- G&R Live, LLC v. JaneseDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.