Legal Opinion

Russell Flour & Feed Co. v. Walker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 14, 1931No. 21914PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action was commenced in this court to review an order and award of the State Industrial Commission.

The respondent, Wilbur A. Walker, was employed by the Russell Flour & Feed Company, a mercantile establishment, engaged in wholesale and retail business, in the capacity of traveling salesman and collector, whose duties required him to go from store to store to get orders for the company and collecting for same. I-Iis territory included the towns of Earlsboro, Troy, and Mounds, Okla. The respondent had just come out of one of the stores at Troy, and while walking along the streets of said…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Arizona Eastern Railroad v. MatthewsArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Drumbight Feed Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. MolloySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Grand Lodge Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen v. OrrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pemberton Bakery v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Daugherty v. National Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Pawnee Ice Cream Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. H. J. Heinz Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. International Harvester Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API