Legal Opinion

Thurston Chemical Company v. Casteel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 19, 1955No. 36368PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

On June 17, 1953, Otto Quinton Casteel while in the employ of Thurston Chemical Company sustained an accidental injury consisting’ of an injury to his head resulting in his death.

On July 16, 1953, Madge Oleta Casteel, surviving widow of deceased, individually and as next friend of three minor children, dependents arid heirs of deceased, filed a claim for compensation under the Death Benefits Provision of the Workmen’s Compensation L'aw against petitioner Thurston Chemical Company and its insurance carrier. The trial commissioner denied compensation on the theory that the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kyle v. Greene High SchoolSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  2. R. J. Allison, Inc. v. BolingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Mead Bros. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Pemberton Bakery v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  2. Bickley Ex Rel. Estate of Bickley v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Director of Finance v. AlfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  5. Harris v. La QuintaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API