Legal Opinion
H. J. Heinz Co. v. Wood
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 7, 1937No. 27804PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAYLESS, V. C. J.
H. J. Heinz Company, an employer, and Maryland Casualty Company, its insurance carrier, petition this court for a review of the award of the State Industrial Commission in favor of F. J. Wood, an employee.
The facts are not a controversial issue. Upon the facts the parties raised two legal issues. H. J. Heinz Company is a manufacturer of foods. It sells these foods in wholesale quantities to retail merchants. It maintains an establishment in Oklahoma City from which it sends salesmen and rep resentatives to sell its products, and from which it makes deliveries and otherwise…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Veazey Drug Co. v. BruzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Pemberton Bakery v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Chestnut Smith v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. GearyNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- International Harvester Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Sowinski v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corporation v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Coon v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Clopton v. City of MuskogeeCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.