Legal Opinion
State v. Ross
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 2004No. 04-AP-048PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtIMoyer, C.J.
{¶ 1} Attorneys Lawrence Whitney, Max Kravitz, and David Chesnoff filed an affidavit on May 3, 2004, with the Clerk of this court, under R.C. 2501.13, seeking *1234the disqualification of Judge Donna Carr from acting on any further proceedings in State v. Ross, case No. 21906, in the Court of Appeals for Summit County.
{¶ 2} Judge Carr responded to the affidavit, indicating that she had not been assigned to the three-judge panel designated to hear the appeal involving Denny Ross, and she therefore viewed the affidavit as moot. In light of that response, I entered judgment on May 24, 2004,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Arlo TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. CaggianoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- State v. HarrellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Smith v. BeckmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In re Disqualification of GallOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Disqualification of BasingerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Disqualification of BatesOhio Supreme Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.