Legal Opinion

State v. Harrell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1996No. 94-1655-CRPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.

The issue before us is whether, in a case tried by the district attorney's office, a circuit court judge, whose spouse is an assistant district attorney in the same county, is required to disqualify himself or herself under either Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(a) (1993-94),1 — prohibiting a judge from hearing a case when a close relative is "counsel thereto" *657for either party — or Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(g),2 —prohibiting a judge from hearing a case when the judge determines he or she cannot retain his or her impartiality. We hold that neither Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(a) nor Wis. Stat. § 757.19(2)(g)…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. State v. American TV & Appliance of Madison, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Cynthia E. v. La Crosse County Human Services DepartmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Rolo v. GoersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Chris Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. CarprueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. PinnoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API