Legal Opinion

Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense v. Arlo Tatum

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 10, 1972No. 71-288PublishedCited by 287 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

408 U. S. 1. Motion to withdraw opinion of this Court denied. Motion to recuse, nunc pro tunc, presented to Mr. Justice Rehnquist, by him denied.

Memorandum of Mr. Justice Rehnquist.

Respondents in this case have moved that I disqualify myself from participation. While neither the Court nor any Justice individually appears ever to have done so, I have determined that it would be appropriate for me to state the reasons which have led to my decision with respect to respondents' motion. In so doing, I do not wish to suggest that I believe such a course would be desirable or even appropriate in any…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by287 opinions

  1. Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
  3. Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  5. Turner v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990

282 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API