Legal Opinion

Hatfield v. Cummings

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1898No. 18,354PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom the Wabash Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellee, as receiver, sued to collect a note, and to foreclose a mortgage given by appellants to said association to secure the payment of said note. The issues made were tried by the court, resulting in a special finding of facts, on which the court stated conclusions of law leading to judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

The assignment of errors calls in question the sufficiency of the complaint, the action of the court in overruling appellants’ demurrer thereto; in overruling appellants’ motion in *282arrest of judgment; in overruling appellant James M. Hatfield’s demurrer to the second…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lime City Building, Loan & Savings Ass'n v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Bangs v. . DuckinfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Pressley v. LambIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Earhart v. Farmers' CreameryIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Cook v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CanadayIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Threadgill v. ColcordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. Sheeks v. State ex rel. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. McAnally v. GliddenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API