Legal Opinion

McAnally v. Glidden

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1902No. 4,253PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Erom Knox Circuit Court; G. W. Shaw, Judge. Action by John McAnally and others against Ira Glidden, receiver of the Old Pittsburg Coal Company, and others, for the enforcement of liens for labor and material. Erom a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

John McAnally and seventy-three others, joining by agreement of all parties, filed a “new” complaint, in two paragraphs, against appellees. Trial was had, special findings of fact made and conclusions of law stated in favor of the defendants. From a judgment rendered in accordance therewith the plaintiffs take this appeal, challenging the correctness of each conclusion of law by their assignment of errors. No excuse exists for setting out the extended findings of fact. The salient facts upon which the decision of the case ultimately depends are as *23follows: The Old Pittsburg Coal Company, an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dobschuetz v. HollidayIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hopkins v. HudsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Gaskill v. TrainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. EatonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  5. Hatfield v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Savings Trust Co. of St. Louis v. SkainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Holland v. FarrierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Hubbard v. Security Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. National Lumber Co. v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Gardner v. Sullivan Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API