Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Canaday

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1900No. 18,704PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Erom the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.

— This action is to enjoin the collection of certain promissory notes assigned by the Citizens Bank of Union City, to appellant Taylor, treasurer of Union City, *672in alleged violation of §2934 Burns 1894. Trial, finding and judgment for the plaintiff. Separate assignments of error call in question the sufficiency of the complaint, the correctness of the conclusions of law, and the action of the court in overruling appellant’s several motions for venire de novo and for a new trial. .

The special finding discloses the following facts: The Citizens Bank of Union City was legally organized March 27,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Relender v. State ex rel. UtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Scanlin v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Bartholomew v. PiersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Locke v. Merchants National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Eckart v. Fort Wayne & Northern Indiana Traction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Gray v. McLaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Horn v. LuptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Hoffman v. IslerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API