Jones v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom Oáss Circuit Court; G. A. Gamble, Judge. "William Jones was convicted of forgery, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.
The appellant was indicted for the crime of forgery, and, upon a trial by a jury, was found guilty as charged. Judgment was i*endered upon the verdict.
The only error not waived by failure to discuss it is the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial, and the sole point made by counsel for appellant under this assignment is that the court erred in giving instructions numbered fourteen, sixteen, and twenty-six, at the request of the State.
The motion for a new trial contained this specification: “(1) The court erred in giving instructions 1, 2, 3, ,4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cargar v. FeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Maynard v. WaidlichIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
- Masterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. CregorIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Osburn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Fairbanks v. WarrumIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Wolverton v. WolvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Young v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Fowler v. NewsomIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.