Legal Opinion

Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2009No. S150528PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

In these consolidated workers’ compensation cases, we consider the scope of Labor Code section 4607, which provides: “Where a party to a proceeding institutes proceedings to terminate an award made by the appeals board to an applicant for continuing medical treatment and is unsuccessful in such proceedings, the appeals board may determine the amount of attorney’s fees reasonably incurred by the applicant in resisting the proceeding to terminate the medical treatment, and may assess such reasonable attorney’s fees as a cost upon the party instituting the proceedings to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  3. California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. SnookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Claxton v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. King v. CompPartners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Koszdin v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Duncan v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. King v. Comppartners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 4th District2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API