Legal Opinion

Elhajj v. Elhajj

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1992No. 466PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

In this equitable distribution action, we are asked to determine if the trial court’s distribution of husband’s federal civil service retirement pension, using the immediate offset method, while retaining jurisdiction to allow the pension to be revalued in the event husband retired before age 65, is error.

Husband, William J. Elhajj, argues on appeal, that if his pension cannot be fairly valued now, the trial court should have used the deferred distribution method to value his pension at retirement. Husband maintains that the trial court should have distributed his pension,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Braderman v. BradermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. DeMasi v. DeMasiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Cornbleth v. CornblethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Zollars v. ZollarsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,920, 22 Employee Benefits Cas. 2649, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1918, 1999 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2457 in Re Fred Lowenschuss, Debtor. Fred Lowenschuss, Individually and in All Capacities, and Sun International North America, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. Beverly Selnick, in Re Fred Lowenschuss, Debtor. Fred Lowenschuss v. Beverly SelnickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. McClain v. McClainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Lowenschuss v. SelnickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Rimel v. RimelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API