Legal Opinion

Rimel v. Rimel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

PANELLA, J.:

¶ 1 The issue in this divorce case is whether the trial court, in adopting the recommendation of the equitable distribution master, erred in failing to utilize a social security set-off when calculating the value of the Civil Service Retirement System (“CSRS”) pension of appellant, James 0. Rimel, Sr., (“Husband”). The appeal is from the order entered on March 15, 2005, in the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County. After careful review, we reverse and remand.

¶2 Husband and appellee, Dianne E. Rimel (“Wife”), were married on April 12, 1975 in York, Pennsylvania. Two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Cornbleth v. CornblethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Elhajj v. ElhajjSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. McClain v. McClainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Cohenour v. CohenourSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  2. In re the Marriage of: Brian D. Hamond & Patricia C. Abrams-HamondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Martinez v. Martinez, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API